See all forum discussions about EBOM-2009 MRc1
 Subscribe to new posts about EBOM-2009 MRc1 Post a new question aboutEBOM-2009 MRc1
See LEEDuser’s guidance on EBOM-2009 MRc1»
FAQs about MRc1 :

We purchased hundreds of ongoing consumables items during our performance period. Do we have to enter each discrete purchase into the LEED Online credit form?

Our organization has a centralized purchasing program that buys products for several buildings, including the one pursuing LEED-EBOM certification. It’s difficult to track which ongoing consumable goods purchases are used in the EBOM building versus the

Purchasing for our organization takes place in the EBOM project building, but not all ongoing consumable goods that are purchased end up being used there. Should we include all of the purchases in MRc1?

We have multiple tenants in our building, some of which are nonresponsive to requests for purchasing records. Can we exclude their purchases?

Does a signed letter from a product manufacturer that states the sustainability criteria met by a particular product count as acceptable LEED documentation?

Do manufacturer claims about the average recycled content, etc. in all its products count as acceptable LEED documentation? For example, a toner cartridge website says that the average post-consumer recycled content is 90% across all its toner products.

Lots of products we purchase seem like they could be tracked in two different purchasing credits. For example, toilet tissue seem like an ongoing consumable since it’s replaced frequently at a low cost per unit (MRc1), but it’s also used for our green

The credit language says we need to track paper (printing or copy paper, notebooks, notepads, envelopes), toner cartridges, binders, batteries and desk accessories. Is that everything we have to track for this credit?

View answers »

Forum discussion

EBOM-2009 MRc1:Sustainable Purchasing—Ongoing Consumables

soy based ink

Might seem obvious, but would soy-based inks qualify as rapidly renewable? I haven't seen mention of this anywhere. The office I'm working on has 10x higher expenditure on printing ink than all other office supplies put together.

1
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Mon, 10/31/2011 - 03:03

Yes, I would definitely say that the soy content in inks would meet the rapidly renewable definition. I would check what percentage of the ink is actual soy content. (And I'm curious what the answer is if you find out.)

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.