See all forum discussions about NC-v4 EQc7
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4 EQc7 Post a new question aboutNC-v4 EQc7
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EQc7»
FAQs about EQc7 :

Can I use Revit to document this credit?

Can electrochromic glazing qualify as a glare control device?

Do I actually need to submit the USGBC Daylight and Quality Views calculator?

What types of glare control are acceptable for this credit?

My office space will have cubicles with high partitions. Should I include those in my model?

Can I mix and match daylight analysis methods? What if one room meets the illuminance thresholds but not the ASE limit?

What daylight simulation software can I use for LEED compliance?

If I’m pursuing Option 2 or 3, can I average the compliant square footage between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. for a space and use the average as the compliant square footage?

Is it possible to combine Options 1 and 2 for different spaces in the same building?

What spaces are considered regularly occupied and must be included in the calculations?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-v4 EQc7:Daylight

Option 1 - ASE & Automated Blinds

I'm trying to get clear confirmation of whether automatic blinds/shutters can be used to help with achieving the ASE requirements in LEEDV4. If the project confirms it has automatic blinds/shutters, do you just ignore ASE all together and what documentation would need to be provided for this when applying for the credits under option 1 sDA/ASE (Assuming sDA thresholds are met)?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user treed74
TODD REED
Energy Program Specialist
PA DMVA
LEEDuser Expert
626 thumbs up

Mon, 05/07/2018 - 17:36

Yes, ASE can be ignored, LEED Interpretation #100002149 will clarify your question.  https://www.usgbc.org/leedaddenda/100002149 Where the LI does not specify what needs to be provided to confirm the installation of the automated system, i would submit enough proof that it is part of the project. Specifications, purchase orders, drawings, images would work along with a sequence of operation and the location of the sensors. 
Profile picture for user dane
Dane Sanders
Principal
Clanton Associates
LEEDuser Basic Member
46 thumbs up

Tue, 05/08/2018 - 02:40

ASE for the should still be reported for each space, with a note claiming exemption for Automated Dynamic Facade Systems. I agree with Todd that supporting evidence of the Automated Dynamic Facade System products and light transmission characteristics be provided. 

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.