Interesting situation. This seems to be not possible according to the credit language, but I could imagine it being possible, in theory, if you're able to make a case that it's not environmentally damaging in any way, and meets the same credit intent. Do you think you have a shot at doing that?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Yes, I think it might be possible. The only downside that I see is mixing potable water with sea water. Even though it is the natural hydrology of the location, theoretically by doing that I would be reducing the potable water source, (though I´ll try anyway).
The intent of the credit is to “reduce generation of wastewater and potable water demand, while increasing the local aquifer recharge.” I think that what you are doing with wastewater is interesting and does have environmental benefit, but it may not meet the credit intent because your are not reducing potable water demand. If you are, make sure to explain this in your narrative very well and back it up with solid calculations. You may be indirectly recharging the local aquifer by discharging to the sea and could potential make this reasoning if you were able to back it up with some hydrologic cycle information specific to the site. Seems like a long shot....maybe consider an Innovation credit for which you'd need to demonstrate environmental benefits convincingly. Regardless, it's a beneficial strategy as long as quantities of treated water released to salt water is not excessive--as you point out it occurs naturally.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.