See all forum discussions about
Subscribe to new posts about Post a new question about

Forum discussion

No addition or alteration project during performance period

3
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Tue, 12/21/2010 - 17:56

David, this is our first piece of advice under the Bird's Eye View, above. Implement in this case means "have in place." You do not have to have a project during the PP.

Tue, 12/21/2010 - 17:59

Thanks, Tristan. I saw the advice above, but wondered if 2009 submissions were being treated differently from 2008 submissions (by the reviewers). We'll try it and I'll let you know.
Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Tue, 12/21/2010 - 18:05

Oh, sorry. I was reading your post in a hurry and thought it was the other way around. Is the language any different in 2008? If not I would be surprised if there is any difference with the reviewers. We wrote the advice above with EBOM 2008 experience very much present in our minds.

Tue, 12/21/2010 - 18:35

I just did what I could have done before: looked up the 2009 language. The 2009 language also says, "Develop and implement..." We'll give it a try. Thanks.
Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Tue, 12/21/2010 - 18:39

I hope you took advantage of our posting of the 2009 credit language, above in the Credit Language tab!

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.