Hello Marcus,
I have question regarding the energy simulation software. Can we change the simulation software at any review stage.However two reviews are completed and previous simulation done on any software.
Thank you in advance.
Forum discussion
NC-2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance
Hello Marcus,
I have question regarding the energy simulation software. Can we change the simulation software at any review stage.However two reviews are completed and previous simulation done on any software.
Thank you in advance.
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?
For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?
Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?
Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?
Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?
How do I provide a zip code for an international location?
For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?
For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?
Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?
How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?
The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?
Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?
Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?
Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?
Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5914 thumbs up
July 19, 2016 - 11:34 am
You can. It is generally not a good idea to do so however because it opens up the entire model to review again. As the reviewer identifies issues with the models those issues are already reviewed and unless you make changes they con't be reviewed again. With a new model you would be starting from step one. I would only do this is the modeler is certain they can get it 100% right in one review phase since this is all you get in an appeal.