See all forum discussions about NC-2009 SSc4.4
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 SSc4.4 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 SSc4.4
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 SSc4.4»
FAQs about SSc4.4 :

How does one account for off-site parking. Should the LEED boundary encompass this parking? Or alternatively may the project pursue the "no new parking" option?

If a project does not provide parking onsite but provides a shuttle service to new parking offsite, is that considered “no new parking” since the new parking is not onsite?

Does rebuilding an existing parking area with fewer spaces mean “no new parking”?

If a non-residential project wants to use Option 4, which references the  ITE Parking Generation Study, where does one upload and submit required documentation? There is no Option 4 choice in the credit form.

How do you designate preferred parking if the parking facility is not under the owner's control?

How does one apply minimum zoning requirements to a project when it is part of a larger complex or campus?

Are there standards regarding how to document the spaces that will be dedicated as reserved?

How does a carpool/vanpool relate to a shared car service/company when it comes to the preferred parking requirements of this credit?

Should I consider motorbikes and parking spaces for them under this credit? What about fleet vehicles?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 SSc4.4:Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity

Mixed-Use vs. Non-residential Classification for a Hotel

Hi, I am working on a hotel which has several buildings, one main building, two different groups of clusters, 2 suite buildings, and a seperate back of house and a seperate employee residences. The hotel is far away from any town so there is a residential facility for the employees. My question is if we should treat this project as a mixed-use (hotel + residential) or if we should treat this project as a non-residential (hotel only excluding the employee residences treating them as part of the hotel)? Cheers!

3
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Fri, 07/25/2014 - 05:26

Francis, it sounds mixed use to me, relative to this credit. Relative to LEED as a whole, I would check MPR2 and whether it's a good idea to lump all those buildings together under one LEED certification.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.