To the USGBC staff who I know read these comments, please issue consistent guidance for how this credit will be evaluated. I've submitted twice for this credit. The first submission was accepted without comment. Therefore, I submitted the second project using the same approach. The reviewers asked for specific calculation results and obscure things like, how the energy model was modified to account for a scenario of reducing the building SF accommodating teleworking. Where does this even come from? The comment is not even vaguely appropriate for the project type. The USGBC is asking for comments about LEED. How about setting clear expectations for documentation? And yes, I did read the v4.1 updates. The guidance still leaves the door wide open for reviewers to generate a lot more work for design teams.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.Go premium for $12.95 »