"Prohibit on-property smoking within 25 feet of entries, outdoor air intakes and operable windows." Anyone know why 25ft?
As it applies only to "on property" what about buildings where the openings are on the property boundary line, such as directly facing a public side walk?
Would it not be appropriate to allow an engineering solution, e.g. air curtain at an entrance door for example?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11474 thumbs up
December 10, 2009 - 12:08 pm
The 25-foot boundary seems to be the norm for this kind of situation -- not at all unique to LEED. I would guess that LEED borrowed it from some regulation or recommendation about avoiding secondhand smoke.
It does seem a bit arbitrary to enforce the boundary only "on property," but what can LEED, or the building owner, do about public sidewalks? The credit simply enforces the boundary where it can, and leaves the public domain to public rules.
The engineering situation is an interesting idea, and I would recommend submitting a CIR to GBCI if you want an official opinion on this. There are obvious reasons why this solution would not be preferable, among them energy use, and the high risk that it would break down or not perform as intended in all circumstances (what ventilation system doesn't have these problems?) and so would not be a reliable protection for occupants.