This is an academic problem that I need confirmation for. It’s a LEED-NC 2009 project.
• 242 FTEs. No visitors, etc. 50:50 gender ratio = 121 of each.
• All urinals are waterless.
• All water closet (WC) flush valves are dual flush (1.6-gpf | 1.1-gpf).
• 11 of the 40 total WCs are plumbed with reclaimed industrial rinse water. 11/40 = 72.5% potable & 27.5% (or 0.275 integer) non-potable. Of these 11 reclaimed WCs, 7 are in a women’s bathroom, the other 4 in a men’s.
When we populated the WE Pre-1 Form in LEED Online we used 351 Daily Uses (72.5%) for the Baseline (1.6-gpf) and Installed (1.35-gpf) rates for potable water WCs. On a second row we entered 133 Daily Uses (27.5%) for the reclaimed-source WCs. We entered 242 Daily Uses for urinals (1.0-gpf and 0.0-gpf). This yielded a 53.78% reduction for flush fixtures.
However, the WEp1 Form does not state how many gallons/year of reclaimed water are generated and this value is needed to populate the WEc2 form. We figured there are 484 WC flushing events/day as follows: (6 X 121 FTE) – (2 X 121FTE urinals flushing) = 484 WC flushes/day. Our weighted daily flush rate = [Sum of (1.35-gpf X 29) + (0.0-gpf X 11)] = 0.99-gpf. Then, 484 flushes/day X 0.99-gpf X 0.275 X 250 days/year = 32,942.25-gal./year reclaimed water. This is the volume we entered in the WEc2 LEED Online form for On-Site treated Wastewater, yielding a 66.35% reduction. So far, so good.
However, out of curiosity I did a separate calculation using the same fixtures, daily uses and rates, assuming that 35% (7/20 WCs) of all female WC flushes are reclaimed and male WC flushes 20% reclaimed (4/20 WCs). For the Design case flush rates this yielded a total reduction of 49,913 gal/year of reclaimed water = 73% reduction. If I used the Baseline flush rates this yielded 60,500 gal/year reduction (77%).
We earn the credit with room to spare. But, inquiring minds want to know: which reduction calculation should I use to match a GBCI-accepted methodology?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11474 thumbs up
November 27, 2015 - 2:32 pm
David, can you focus in your question more? Thanks!