Our contractor is telling us we can not meet 62.1-2007 because we do not have the chiller capacity, but we can meet the 10 cfm/person requirement of case 2. If we go this route, does this disqualify us from attempting IEQc1.2?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11477 thumbs up
December 7, 2010 - 9:40 pm
I don't think that IEQp1 case 2 is necessarily counter to IEQc1.2. Do you think you can meet the IEQc1.2 requirements?
Laura Girard
12 thumbs up
December 8, 2010 - 9:54 am
That is the plan. We hired this contractor to ensure we met IEQp1, and install monitoring for IEQc1.2. We are trying to ensure p1: Case 2 won't hinder our plans for achieving c1.2.