LEED default materials cost is 45% of total construction costs (based on specific Master Format divisions). What if in a given country we know that materials costs constitute a much higher part in the total construction costs and can be equal to even around 60-70%? Should we still use the default of 45% or should we use our own assumption which is more strict? In other words can we estimate and increase the default value from 45% to e.g. 70% so LEED documentation is more accurate? The project group doen't want to use the actual material cost option due to the size and complexity of the project.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.