See all forum discussions about NC-v4 MRc3
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4 MRc3 Post a new question aboutNC-v4 MRc3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 MRc3»
FAQs about MRc3 :

The credit language says “Products meeting recycled content criteria are valued at 100% of their cost for the purposes of credit achievement calculation.” How much recycled content has to be in a product for 100% of its cost to count toward credit achieve

Is there any way around the requirement that no more than 30% of the materials used to meet Option 2 be structure and enclosure items?

If Sustainable Agricultural Network (SAN) certification isn’t required for agricultural products to comply with Option 2, does the manufacturer still have to provide documentation of third-party verification?

For the manufacturer “take-back” pathway under Option 2, does the extended producer responsibility program have to be run by the manufacturer?

Are there other ways the products can contribute to Option 1?

Can Corporate Sustainability Reports from the manufacturers of the products I’ve selected help me achieve the Option 1 point for “raw material source and extraction reporting?”

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-v4 MRc3:Building product disclosure and optimization - sourcing of raw materials

CSRs

These reports are very wide range ...but the credit is dealing with sources of raw material extraction.....?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user jmlade_2
John Mlade
LFA, RESET ASP, WELL Faculty, LEED Fellow
Wight & Company
LEEDuser Expert
6 thumbs up

Sat, 05/16/2015 - 03:00

Neslihan, The credit is more encompassing than the "source" of raw material in a literal sense. In this context, it also considers long-term corporate commitment to land use practices, reducing the impacts of extraction and manufacturing, and also voluntarily meeting applicable standards. The CSR programs listed include, but are far more expansive than extraction practices alone. Does this help answer your question? If not, please reframe your question and I'd be happy to take another stab at it.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.