Controllability in Gallery/Exhibition spaces

I haven't had this come up on a v4 project yet, but I had a similar situation in older versions. One project in particular was a mental healthcare facility that was obviously occupied, but for many many reasons, the occupants were not allowed local controllability of the spaces. We were able to justify the situation specific to our project, and provided documentation that the staff had the appropriate control types collocated in their secure access space only and could change settings as needed for various individual needs and uses.

    It is best to check directly with LEED, but here is their definition of regularly occupied spaces: https://www.usgbc.org/glossary/term/5563. In addition, here is a list of examples of regularly occupied spaces: https://www.usgbc.org/resources/examples-regularly-occupied-spaces-include-following I noticed that "Exhibition Hall" is included, but I imagine this is for the type of convention hall situation similar to, for example, Greenbuild. A gallery for art or display, however, seems to be different. The example list does not include "art galleries" or "museums" for instance. It seems they should be excluded particularly because a gallery is not an area where people are, "seated or standing as they work, study, or perform other focused activities inside a building" - although I am often focused when in a museum, visiting a gallery typically does not involve task based activity or work. In addition, the definition specifies tasks for over 1 hour per person per day, and visitors are unlikely to spend 1 hour in a single part of the gallery, let alone for a day on average.