You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Good points, Marian. Bisphenol A is the chemical behind the consumer revolt last year that led to massive change in the chemistry of sport water bottles and sippy cups. The National Institutes of Health cites evidence of reproductive and developmental toxicant effects. EPA has targeted BPA in an Action Plan for potential regulation citing particular concern for pregnant women, and children and potential for long-term adverse effects on growth, reproduction and development in aquatic species at concentrations similar to those found in the environment.
Biomonitoring has found BPA widespread in humans. Where is it coming from? Most of the attention to date has been focused on BPA use in water bottles, sippy cups, food can linings and register receipts, but BPA is used fairly extensively in buildings caulks, adhesives, grouts, high performance paints and floor sealers as well as various polycarbonate plastics such as glazings and wall protections.
No free BPA in epoxy? Maybe. But studies of workers applying BPA based epoxies have shown evidence that the epoxy metabolizes back into BPA and alters sex hormones.
All in all, there are plenty of reasons for a precautionary avoidance of BPA and HBN's Pharos Project identifies building products that are known to contain BPA based compounds.
For more information on BPA see “Bisphenol A in Building Materials: High Performance Paint Coatings” http://www.healthybuilding.net/healthcare/2009-07-17_BPA_memo_FINAL.pdf
Hi Tom--
Thanks for sharing all this info! Which pilot credit in LEED does BPA avoidance fit in? I've been told it is not a PBT.
Second aside: It would be great to know if the epoxy resin mfrs. are going to address this somehow. For concrete tunnels, airports, etc., this mixture of BPA and epichlorohydrin, a hazardous substance and organochlorine, apparently is the only way to create high performance adhesives and grouts.
BPA currently doesn't fit under a LEED pilot credit. I'm not familiar with how this was decided or whether it's being considered as an addition.
In addition to the really good information and dialog on Healthy Building Network's site (great context & relevance) check www.chemsec.org Their SIN list (Substitute It Now) is a fast and reliable look into various chemicals. When the site opens look to the upper right side and click "Go to SIN list database". There you can enter the name of the chemical in question, such as "bisphenol a", and learn lots in just a few minutes. Perkins+Will shares their Radical Transparency list; readily available on their website. The Living Building Challenge also has a list of materials/chemicals to avoid.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.