See all forum discussions about NC-2009 SSc4.4
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 SSc4.4 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 SSc4.4
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 SSc4.4»
FAQs about SSc4.4 :

How does one account for off-site parking. Should the LEED boundary encompass this parking? Or alternatively may the project pursue the "no new parking" option?

If a project does not provide parking onsite but provides a shuttle service to new parking offsite, is that considered “no new parking” since the new parking is not onsite?

Does rebuilding an existing parking area with fewer spaces mean “no new parking”?

If a non-residential project wants to use Option 4, which references the  ITE Parking Generation Study, where does one upload and submit required documentation? There is no Option 4 choice in the credit form.

How do you designate preferred parking if the parking facility is not under the owner's control?

How does one apply minimum zoning requirements to a project when it is part of a larger complex or campus?

Are there standards regarding how to document the spaces that will be dedicated as reserved?

How does a carpool/vanpool relate to a shared car service/company when it comes to the preferred parking requirements of this credit?

Should I consider motorbikes and parking spaces for them under this credit? What about fleet vehicles?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 SSc4.4:Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity

Alternative Compliance Paths for projects Outside the U.S.

Hi all, This alternative compliance path for projects outside US with no minimum parking requirements seems to exist http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=10335 However the referenced Form which is supposed to be located under Credit Resources is not appearing on the LEED online site. I've registered the query with LEED online but wanted to check if anyone else has used this option previously? Thanks.

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Fri, 02/01/2013 - 00:54

Lewis, I believe the issue is that since the ACPs were originally introduced, they have been rolled directly into the LEED Online forms, so that the form you're looking for should no longer be relevant, as long as you have the most update to date version of the credit form. If there is a question of that, have GBCI update it.

Fri, 02/01/2013 - 02:02

Thanks Tristan. Worth noting that our project will be targeting Option 3 on the new for (no zoning requirements) which requires use of the 2003 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) "Parking Generation" study. Some background info on the ITE study here: http://www.leeduser.com/topic/money-guesswork-ite-parking-generation-study-2003-SSc4.4-LEED-NC-certification

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.