I am working on a project that at the initial project team meetings and scorecard review it was indicated that the Phase 1 ESA had been done and that there were no significant issues. Now, I have been able to review the document, and it clearly indicates that the study has revealed REC's in connection with the subject property but no Phase 2 ESA was done. The project is now well under construction. On the positive side the issues that were revealed in the Phase 1 ESA have been addressed properly and legally and all of the work can be documented. My question is, is it a reasonable Alternative Compliance Path to submit the Phase 1 ESA Executive Summary and include documentation of the work, permits and activity that took place to address each of the conditions revealed by the Phase 1 ESA or can a follow-up Phase 1 be conducted prior to occupancy?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11474 thumbs up
August 26, 2017 - 8:04 pm
I would go ahead and try to do something here. It's going to require contacting GBCI and getting either guidance or a CIR.