Adhering to EN 15251 and EN 13779. In some instances EN 15251 is stricter than EN 13779 and visa verse, but if you know your way around these norms, this is a good alternative path.
The requirements and procedures (in principle) are almost identical to ASHRAE 62.1, with a few small differences (for example toilet exhaust rates).
Susann Geithner
PrincipalEmerald Built Environments
1297 thumbs up
October 31, 2011 - 11:39 am
Agreed. A lot of projects have way more outside air than required by ASHRAE 62.1, a lot of dedicated outside air systems and 100% OA but the toilet exhaust is less.
Bernadette Stauder-Buschlinger
bauperformance GmbH16 thumbs up
December 2, 2011 - 4:54 am
I appreciate the new possibilities given by the ACP for projects outside the U.S. Is it possible to use the EN 15251 and EN 13779 for the IEQ category and ASHRAE for EAp2 and c1? Then two regulations will be applied to one project. What is your opinion?
Deon Glaser
Director, LEED International Technical DevelopmentUSGBC
54 thumbs up
December 2, 2011 - 4:45 pm
Hello Bernadette, thank you for your question and your thoughts on the ACPs. The LEED 2009 ACPs may be used individually by project teams as they are needed. This means that projects may use the ACP for IEQp1 but not for EAp2 if teams wish. Therefore, the CEN Standard EN 15251 & EN 13779 may be used for the related credits in IEQ and ASHRAE 90.1-2007 may be used for the related credits in EA.
Maria Kutelova
56 thumbs up
January 10, 2012 - 7:59 am
Dear Deon,
Is it possible to opt for ACP after preliminary design review feedback has been received. The ACP for int. project were issued after we have submitted for design review.
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks in advance!
Deon Glaser
Director, LEED International Technical DevelopmentUSGBC
54 thumbs up
January 10, 2012 - 6:05 pm
Hello Maria, and thank you for your question. Project teams are able to apply the LEED 2009 ACPs to their project even after their design review is complete. However, each credit will still only be given two rounds of review (preliminary and final) before an appeal is required. This means if a credit was reviewed without using the ACP during the preliminary design review phase and the ACP strategy was applied during the final design review phase the ACP strategy will only be reviewed once before an appeal is required.
We hope this resolves your issue. In the future please feel free to submit your questions on the certification and review process by going directly to http://www.gbci.org/contactus. This will allow you to submit your project information so GBCI can review your project when answering your inquiry and giving you a more detailed answer.
Petr Vogel
Specialist ConsultantEkoWATT CZ
4 thumbs up
October 4, 2012 - 7:15 am
Dear Deon, dear all,
when following ACP EN 13779:2007 in CS.IEQp1 and CS.IEQc2 we do experience a very uncertain conditions given by this method in terms of IAQ – fresh air supply. Acc. to EN 13779:2007 it is possible to set classes from low to high IAQ (IDA 4 – IDA 1). This is then significantly implying the amount of fresh air needed.
Is this really flexible for us/investor to freely set the targeted class of IAQ or is it somehow more specified? I did not find any further specification what class should be taken.
What is the implication on the credit IEQc2 of the classes IDA 1-4 + 30%? Also very flexible then plus the credit makes no sense then if it is free to set IDA class of IAQ.
Please could somebody clarify this?
Thanks,
Petr
Tristan Roberts
RepresentativeVermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
11477 thumbs up
November 23, 2012 - 10:45 am
Petr, I would recommend posting your question to our IEQc2 forum. Thanks.