about that working group....

Tristan Roberts

Representative

Vermont House of Representatives

LEEDuser Expert

7780 thumbs up

April 5, 2013

USGBC is now taking volunteers for that working group to figure out how to implement this option. The option is also available as a pilot credit, MRpc79.

Post a reply

Peggy White

White + GreenSpec

LEEDuser Basic Member

59 thumbs up

Fri, 04/05/2013 - 15:41

Hahaha - too funny! Perhaps they could have considered value and implementation when they developed Option 3. It will be interesting to see what the LEED v4 ballot looks like.

Peggy White

White + GreenSpec

LEEDuser Basic Member

59 thumbs up

Mon, 05/06/2013 - 14:11

I hope that the 'Working Group' is taking a good look at how the ACC is really approaching transparency: http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2013/05/06/why-cant-acc-tell-the-truth-about-the-safe-chemicals-act/ I honestly don't see how any program the ACC develops for reporting on chemical content will enhance the healthy qualities of building materials. Their talent seems to be obfuscation, not transparency.

Abena Darden

Vice President

Thornton Tomasetti

LEEDuser Premium Member

188 thumbs up

Tue, 05/14/2013 - 00:51

This is an excellent blog entry! Thanks for posting it.