Does rebuilding an existing parking area with fewer spaces mean “no new parking”?
Yes. Rebuilding a current parking lot with fewer spaces will meet the credit intent.
Yes. Rebuilding a current parking lot with fewer spaces will meet the credit intent.
The Minimum Program Requirements supplemental guidance document covers these situations in some detail. The boundary needs to include "contiguous land that is associated with and supports normal building operations."
The Reference Guide gives little guidance for this and states projects will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. LEED 2009 requirements are more specific, and while not officially applicable, provide some direction.
Significant reductions for tradable surfaces in LZ1 and LZ2 and some in LZ3. See the new table for details.
No, non-potable groundwater used for irrigation (other than nuisance groundwater, i.e. water pumped away from a foundation) is considered a potential potable source and would not count towards Option 2.
Many projects have had questions about the definition of previously developed. Note that LEED 2009 projects have had the relevant definition updated by USGBC through a November 2011 addendum. Be sure to reference that definition, which is more specific, if it is applicable to your project.
No, this is not an accepted compliance path. LEEDuser's experts agree that you are unlikely to get traction with this due to the immediate and unsustainable impacts on local ecosystems and hydrology.
Seek the opinion of an equivalent local regulatory agency, or a professional hydrologist.
LEED does not have published exceptions to the prime farmland requirement. You would need to submit a CIR to get an official ruling.
However, some projects have had success contacting the local USDA representative and requesting an evaluation to get an exemption due to the low probability that the land could be usable for agricultural purposes.