Has anyone found that they earned more or less points by using the 2016 PRM comparison rather than a 2010 PRM comparison? Is there any research or reference that I can show my client that they will/won't be risking losing points by using this method? I would much rather use 90.1-2016 PRM comparison for LEED since I can also use it for code compliance but stakeholders a skeptical that using a newer version of 90.1 will net them the same pts.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.