Forum discussion

NC-v4 EAp1:Fundamental commissioning and verification

Enhanced Commissioning

We are working on a big project, we are the LEED subcontractor (consultant) of the general contractor (All trades), 
The owner gave all LEED responsibilities to the general contractor, so to design a CxA,  they offered to us to provide this service, and we want to know: are we considered as a member of the execution team? knowing that we validate (check, confirm) the conformity of products and systems (datasheets), but we did not do the static and even dynamic commissioning.
not a member of the construction team
are we eligible to do the fundamental Cx?
Same question for enhanced Cx

Thank you

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 06/25/2019 - 17:44

We have successfully served as the CxA in a similar scenario based on the contractual requirements for a project.  At a minimum though you have to make sure you can justify your direct line responsibility to the Owner if called into question.  A letter (affidavit) from the Owner accepting this relationship and adknowledging the situation would probably be a good place to start to make sure you are outlining the relationship.  

Sun, 08/11/2019 - 21:49

It also comes down to qualifications, have you done this before for a similar project. Performance testing is almost always done by the contractors (who still own the systems) but the methodology and process are designed and observed by the CxA. That is the part that you have to experience and expertise in performing.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.