FAQs about EAc1 :

How do I account for computers with multiple monitors on Portfolio Manager?

How should I treat vacant space on Portfolio Manager?

Our building includes a large laboratory space. Can our project benchmark under the Labs21 program?

We have an international project and the space type is eligible for an Energy Star rating. Can we pursue Case 1 to demonstrate compliance given the recently released alternative compliance paths for international projects?

We have a number of buildings on a single campus that we would like to certify at the same time. Is it possible to benchmark the buildings at the campus level?

I have a mixed-use building and am wondering if it is possible to pursue the prerequisite through Case 1. How do we proceed?

We have a building that consists of two attached structures and it’s unclear if we have to consider it a single building or if it should be certified as two separate buildings and benchmarked accordingly. How should we proceed?

How long is an Energy Star label valid to use with a streamlined approach for Case 1?

Our building includes heavy process loads that significantly increase the overall energy use in the building. If we submeter these loads, can we exclude this energy use for benchmarking purposes?

We have installed submeters on our building but the utility bill includes energy use from several other buildings located on the same campus. How do we reconcile this during the LEED review process?

When is it possible to exclude up to 10% of the building from EAp2?

What do I do if the number of building occupants, operating hours, or vacant space changes during the performance period?

If you pursue the streamlined path for an Energy Star label, should the performance period for EAc6 match the 12-month time frame of the label?

View answers »

Forum discussion

EBOM-2009 EAc1:Optimize Energy Performance

Case 2 Option 2C

I am working with a convention center that is currently Silver certified under the v2009 EBOM rating system. 

This facility has a very high event turnover and consequently uses energy consistently due to the high level of activity and it's EUI is penalizing due to the fact that it is a small facility (not a large convention center). For this reason, despite being an efficient facility, during the certification process out of the 18 points available for credit EAc1 we were only able to get 1 credit. Even the prereq ECp2 was in danger of not being met. 

As none of the options for calculating performance are suitable to improve this situation, we are trying to see if Case 2 Option 2C, which includes use of historical data and comparable building, can support our case that more points should be awarded based on the actual energy performance of the building. We contacted several convention centers to try and obtain comparable energy data but we have not been too lucky.

Does anyone have any advice on where to get this information (e.g., databases) or on another approach to take to be able to get more recognition for this facility? It seems like an issue in LEED that needs to be worked out. A large convention center with lower level of activity may get lots of points in credit EAc1 because of the large square footage and fewer events.

Thanks. 

 

 

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 01/15/2019 - 22:53

What path did the project pursue under the previous EBOM certification? Have you had any luck mining the municipal benchmarking data? That may be less information that you need if the feeling is that number of visitors and quantity of events is a factor. I'm not sure exactly what the normalization will look like - other convention centers are very busy as well, but the monthly weighted average of exhibit area is probably a strong driver that you won't be able to get from publicly available sources. How small is the facility if you can provide a range? Is it part of an educational or hospitality campus?  

Tue, 01/15/2019 - 23:15

The facility is about 72,000 sqf. It's a stand alone building that has a hotel that was not included in the certification.

Tue, 01/22/2019 - 21:14

You could try CBECS to see if there are enough sites that you can filter for a more comparable size facility. I think this will hurt you rather than help though, since these sites won't be providing occupancy percentages to CBECS. Can you make an energy model and perform an asset rating evaluation, such as ASHRAE bEQ or DOE Asset Score?  LEED isn't setup the best to make a case for alternate compliance. As an engineer it would be satisfying in the assessment to see all of the upgrades listed and then their impact on modeled energy use, given consistent occupancy.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.