LEEDv4 Reference guide mentions Globally Harmonized Systems of Classification and lableing of Chemical rev.6 (2015)(GHS) as an approved documentation.

If a HPDv2.1 has content inventory marked as 'per GHS SDS', is it safe to assume that it was per rev.6 (2015) stds?

Post a reply

Tristan Roberts

Representative

Vermont House of Representatives

LEEDuser Expert

7780 thumbs up

Thu, 09/20/2018 - 14:56

Yes, that is a safe assumption. HPD v2.1 was introduced in 2017, so I think it is a fairly safe bet that any SDS data it is relying on is up to date with rev.6 (2015).

Vandita Mudgal

Sr. Sustainability Manager

Hensel Phelps

LEEDuser Basic Member

10 thumbs up

Fri, 09/21/2018 - 20:08

Thanks for the clarification Tristan!

Kairi Noulik

Greenmetrix OÜ

LEEDuser Basic Member

2 thumbs up

Fri, 08/04/2023 - 08:39

Hey Vandita! Was it accepted by the auditor in your case? I recieved a review, in which threshold as per GHS SDS is not accepted. However, as I understand, nowadays "substances that are identified as health hazards are reported at 1,000 ppm (0.1%) for reproductive toxicants, carcinogens, and Category 1 mutagens, and at 10,000 ppm (1%) for all other hazard categories."

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

You are currently logged in under an enterprise account

FAQs about MRc4 :

HPD with GHS SDS

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

Add new comment