We are currently working on a school project that includes four additions to be constructed over several phases. The school would like to seek LEED certification for one of the four additions. The first floor of this addition will serve as the new cafeteria. The second and third floors are classroom spaces. The 3-story addition is oriented perpendicular to two existing, 2-story wings. The existing wings will be the connection points at either end of the addition (basically forming a U-shape). The first and second floor corridors of the existing wings will tie into the corridors of the addition, essentially continuing the circulation. There will be double doors at each of the two existing wing connecting points.
Question #1: Is a LEED boundary that includes only one of the four additions acceptable? If so, what other elements do we need to be concerned with besides separate metering to make sure we are compliant with MPR2?
Thank you for your help in advance.
Stephen Sgro, AIA LEED AP BD+C
Paula Melton
Editorial DirectorBuildingGreen, Inc.
LEEDuser Moderator
183 thumbs up
March 22, 2018 - 3:09 pm
Stephen, have you already been through this part of the MPR language? It looks to me like the addition may be able to be a LEED project as long as it has separate mechanicals and energy meters, but it might be worth contacting USGBC to discuss special circumstances, as recommended below.
Stephen Sgro
Senior ArchitectPS&S Architecture & Engineering, PC
1 thumbs up
March 26, 2018 - 5:29 pm
Thank you Paula. We did in fact review the MPR language but didn't find that it resolved our question. To further clarify, if we have a project that includes several additions, would we be required to include all of them in our boundary or can we seek certification on one of them? We understand that any addition would require separate metering / mechanical. In our case, there would be a central plant so utilities would cross the LEED boundary but we would meter separately.