FAQs about EAp2 :

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Modeling low flow fume hoods in a Lab

Owner wanted all fume hoods operating with 100cfm 24:7. After preliminary energy modelling with 60 cfm during working hours and 30 cfm after hours, we reduce air changes, fan energy and with VAV, more energy during unoccupied hours. This upgrade to energy performance is proving convincing - especially in high desert macroclimate. Question: Is it legitimate to use 100cfm in our base model ?

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 09/29/2017 - 19:29

Correction: 100 fpm (1180 cfm) was original requirement which we are reducing to 60 fpm. This also results in smaller fan hp required.

Mon, 10/02/2017 - 17:32

A professional energy modeler just advised that fume hoods are process loads because they are withdrawing chemicals from labs, not conditioning space for people working in the labs. So... is it still possible to explore the energy savings between constant flow in the baseline and VAV in the proposed? Perhaps through the Exceptional Calculation Method?

Wed, 10/18/2017 - 20:12

Laboratory systems are covered by Appendix G and therefore are not process loads, so energy savings are possible as long as you follow the modeling protocol for the Baseline systems. Here are some notes specific to 90.1-2007: -Exception (d) to Section G3.1.1 requires modeling of system #5 or #7 in Baseline with 50% reduction in exhaust and makeup air volumes during unoccupied periods (for laboratory systems with minimum of 5,000 cfm of exhaust). The User's Manual Appendix G laboratory schedules appear to indicate that this refers to the fume hood being unused (i.e. sash closed), and not to the whole building occupancy conditions. -G3.1.2.10 Exhaust Air Energy Recovery - exception (h) exempts labs with 5,000 cfm of exhaust (i.e. the systems modeled as Baseline per Exception (d) G3.1.1 from requirement for energy recovery in the Baseline). -Table 6.5.3.1.1B Fan Power Limitation Pressure Drop Adjustments include a fume hood exhaust exception (-1.0 in. w.c. adjustment). This means when applied to the laboratory system's supply fan power limitation, the Baseline calculation must apply the -1.0 in. w.c. adjustment, and the fume hood exhaust fan power is separated from the system and modeled as unregulated process energy, with the same W/cfm as that of the Proposed Case. Credit may be taken from improved motor efficiency. Addendum p to 90.1-2007: -Removes the fume hood exhaust exception within Table 6.5.3.1.1B as noted above, and adds two new device credits, one for exhaust system serving fume hoods (0.35 in. w.c.) and laboratory and vivarium exhaust systems in high-rise building (0.25 in. w.c./100 ft of vertical duct exceeding 75 ft) -Modifies pressure credit for "fully ducted return and/or exhaust air systems" from 0.5 to 2.15 in. w.c. for lab and vivarium systems

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.