See all forum discussions about CI-v4 MRc5
 Subscribe to new posts about CI-v4 MRc5 Post a new question aboutCI-v4 MRc5
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CI-v4 MRc5»
FAQs about MRc5 :

Is the REACH pathway in Option 2 available to projects in the U.S.?

Are there ways to get extra credit for products that exceed the thresholds?

Does Cradle-to-Cradle’s Material Health certificate count, or only full Cradle-to-Cradle certification?

For the Declare option do “LBC Compliant” and “Declared” labels count, or only “Red List Free”?

Does any published HPD work for a product to comply with the credit, or are there specific conditions it has to meet?

Does a manufacturer have to reveal everything that’s in a product to comply with the transparency option?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CI-v4 MRc5:Building product disclosure and optimization - material ingredients

UL Product Lens - any USGBC issued acceptance/precedent?

Profile picture for user joanna_1
Joanna Switzer
Sustainability Project Manager
Atkins
LEEDuser Basic Member
59 thumbs up

Hi all, Rumor has it "UL Product Lens" evaluated products qualify for Ingredients Reporting, Option 1. Although the UL website claims this qualification, I am not finding any USGBC/GBCI issued addenda, credit interpretation (or even a press release) to formally approve this strategy. Anyone aware of a formal precedent for this UL administered program? Thx

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Sat, 08/26/2017 - 18:43

Yes, it is allowed—was added by USGBC in an addendum since you posted this. Our credit language here is up to date, and lists it.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.