Hello,
I refer to Donald Green's comment from April 9 2014, "GBCI really wants all buildings in a Group Certification to be very similar, that way the Group Credits can be documented easily. Otherwise you may have issue when trying to document if the buildings are too different. Sounds like a Campus approach with a Master Site may be the best way to go for this project......
Review the new AGMBC issued on 4/1/14."
This makes sense to me.
Until I read page 10 of the April 2014 LEED Campus Guidance - "For O&M projects, all buildings....in the group must share the same space type (or must be eligible to be rated as the same space type in the ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager)." This implies the "similarity" criteria applies only to LEED EBOM, no?
Further down on page 10 of the Campus Guidance "For credits that must be documented on an individual building or space basis, points are awarded to the group based on the lowest performing building except where noted in the credit specific information in the appendices."
Does this mean that if one building in a Group achieves 12% of energy savings, while another achieves 40%, that the Group as a whole achieves only 12% energy savings?
I have been trying to get clarification on this one issue for the past year - on this forum, from USGBC....to no avail.
Does ANYBODY know?
Thanks in advance!
Eric Anderson
26 thumbs up
May 7, 2015 - 9:34 am
Hello Deborah, Yes, you are correct, that the 'similarity' criterion applies only to O+M projects using the group approach. As noted in the last bullet point on page 10 of the latest Campus Guidance document (released in April of 2014), however, "Each building or space in the group project must independently qualify for the chosen LEED rating system." Thus, even for the BD+C rating systems, if one building qualifies only for NC and the other only for SCH (LEED for Schools), they cannot be included in the same group project.
As to your question about energy savings, you should refer to the appendices for guidance on calculations for particular prerequisites and credits. For instance, for LEED v3/2009 BD+C projects (e.g. LEED-NC) pursuing the group approach, Appendix A of the Campus Guidance indicates that each building in the group will have to individually demonstrate compliance with EAp2--in other words, each new construction building has to demonstrate at least a 10% savings over the energy cost of the baseline. However, the number of points earned in EAc1 for a group project is based upon aggregate performance, not the lowest performing building. As noted in the group certification guidance for EAc1: "The number of points earned shall be based on the ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G performance improvement calculated based on the sum total Baseline and Proposed Case energy cost for all buildings or spaces within the LEED project boundary, including all site lighting and parking structures within the LEED project boundary."
Deborah Lucking
Director of SustainabilityFentress Architects
LEEDuser Expert
258 thumbs up
May 14, 2015 - 5:36 pm
Thanks Eric,
I believe you did advise that earlier, but I 've had contradictory information, and want to be absolutely sure.
Thanks again!