FAQs about EAp2 :

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Process refrigeration

Hello. Apologies for posting on two credits but Scott Bowman rightfully suggested I re-post here. Regarding an ice cream manufacturing facility where we are managing the Cx process I have two queries related to HVAC: We have been integrating with the refrigeration (mostly process but supplying chilled water to HVAC via a heat exchanger) plant's commissioning process and getting that up to standard after all. I have now received the ASHRAE 90.1 mandatory provisions forms back for this equipment and it seems as though some of the compressors/chillers IPLV efficiency is lower than required. However most of them are better than required and the total refrigeration plant (weighted average of the efficiencies) is better than the required value. Will this be acceptable and can we have the designer on record complete the form for one average plant? - the process area, substation and utility room are intended for continuous operation and thus so is the HVAC system serving these spaces (besides shutdown minimal preventative/scheduled maintenance of the HVAC system). I note that ASHRAE 90.1-2007 calls for motorised dampers (and in the case of this max 2 story building, allows gravity dampers) §6.4.3.4.2 and §6.4.3.4.3. The former exempts the dampers for unconditioned spaces but the latter does not have this exclusion (whilst ASHRAE 90.1-2010 does have an exemption for ) and neither have exemptions for manufacturing spaces that run effectively continuously. Do you have guidance on both the need for gravity dampers in this situation for unconditioned spaces as well as continuously operating spaces/systems (they are not always the same)

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 02/12/2015 - 16:40

IPLV - this requirement is for each piece of equipment individually. The weighted average of the whole plant is not a criteria for compliance.Check out the note under Table 6.8.1C. If a chiller produces chilled water under 40 degrees it is not covered by the standard and therefore does not have a minimum efficiency. Dampers - both sections indicate these are requirements for "when the spaces served are not in use". Sounds like you can make the case that the spaces are in continuous use and therefore these sections are not applicable.

Fri, 02/13/2015 - 12:39

Many thanks Markus. I simply overlooked that note, thanks for bringing that to my attention; all our lines are thus exempt. How confident can I be about the case you make for spaces that are in continuous operation, would you recommend approaching the council for an opinion?

Fri, 02/13/2015 - 21:34

I cannot assess your confidence level. Are you confident enough to check the box? I can tell you that this is not an issue that it typically evaluated at all in the LEED review. If you are confident that you meet this mandatory provision then just say so. No one will question it.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.