See all forum discussions about NC-2009 SSc3
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 SSc3 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 SSc3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 SSc3»
FAQs about SSc3 :

Is earning one point for this credit an appropriate reward, given the work involved?

Do we have to get testing done even if contamination is obviously present?

If the remediation work is not part of the LEED project scope, can I still achieve this credit?

Are there minimum contamination thresholds that need to be met in order for a site to be classified as a brownfield?

Am I eligible to earn the credit if there is ongoing remediation on my project site and remediation is not yet complete?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 SSc3:Brownfield Redevelopment

Petrol contamination

My project site is located next to one of the main arteries of Warsaw. Due to the high trafic the strip adjacent to the road is contaminated with petrol related substances (not much but still). Can it qualify to the brownfield credit even though it's just a small part of the site and that the contamination was not caused by the previous land use?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 01/28/2015 - 21:33

Yes, it does not matter where the contamination comes from or how much of the site is contaminated. It matters that you're redeveloping a contaminated site and cleaning it up. Both option 1 and option 2 should be available to your project (using Poland's version of EPA testing). If you can't prove the contamination in either option, then the project will not earn the point.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.