We are wrapping up design for a project that is a Nature Center and are specifying native grasses along the street edge. Trees will be planted between the street and building but the building sits back far from the street because it is to be built along a canyon, integrated with the views and wildlife. Can native grasses and plants be used instead of trees as a more sustainable solution in this case?
Also, The building height to street center ratio, is it encouraging a taller building in relation to the street center or a shorter one? It appears to be promoting a tall building and, if so, is that a necessity for this credit?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Marni Punt
AssociateAurecon
June 3, 2015 - 9:20 am
Hi Trinidee, we have a similar situation in our project. The last tree between the walkway and road closest to the intersection has been left out as to not obstruct motorist views. It is however still landscaped. Have you had any feedback on this?
Trinidee Shelton
15 thumbs up
June 8, 2015 - 10:14 am
Marni, I didn't receive any feedback here, however, the credit was submitted and approved as described. After our initial application, we did receive a response to that item as being a requirement (trees every so often) but provided a response stating that for the project location and use type it was more appropriate to use only existing trees and landscape the remainder with native grasses and bushes. The review team accepted that response and approved the credit. It always depends on the review team, but, if it is an intentional move, definitely worth attempting. Good luck!