See all forum discussions about CI-2009 SSc3.3
 Subscribe to new posts about CI-2009 SSc3.3 Post a new question aboutCI-2009 SSc3.3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CI-2009 SSc3.3»
FAQs about SSc3.3 :

Why are the CI designated parking requirements in Cases 1 and & 2 Option 1 determined by a Full Time Equivalent of tenant space/building while for New Construction the requirements are simply a percentage of parking provided?

If a CI project occupies a building that has existing parking, but no designated parking to the tenant, can it pursue “no parking will be provided"?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CI-2009 SSc3.3:Alternative Transportation—Parking Availability

Two parking clarifications

Profile picture for user jsilliker
Jared Silliker
Owner
Silliker + Partners
LEEDuser Basic Member
46 thumbs up

1. Does "provided" mean no charge to an occupant who is parking in a spot (i.e., parking is included in the lease) or merely that a spot is allocated/reserved for a particular tenant? In my project, there are very few spots included in the lease, but other occupants can still pay for parking on their own if they so desire. 2. In a large multi-tenant building, must the car/vanpool spots be allocated to a tenant, or merely installed for all building occupants? In my project, there are plenty of car/vanpool reserved spots, but none are allocated to a particular tenant.

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Sat, 07/26/2014 - 05:18

Jared, I would say that provided can be either definition that you provide.I would say that the vanpool spaces do not need to be allocated, but if they are not allocated then they need to be present in sufficient quantity to meet the credit requirements for the whole building.

Sat, 07/26/2014 - 17:31

Regarding "provided" it may depend on your exact language. I would say if the lease states how many spaces are available to the tenant, then those would be the ones "provided." If there's an option to pay for parking that anyone can use (i.e. someone coming to that location to shop in neighboring buildings, etc.) then I would say it those spots are NOT provided to the tenant. But this may depend on your specific situation / set up. (Are the pay parking spots that are available any different from paying for parking on your own in a neighboring lot?)

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.