FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Question Regarding Process Loads

Hello again! We are finalizing our model for a v3 Core and Shell Building Renovation. Our model is telling us that our process loads are under the requisite 25%, 23.66% to be exact. We would like to know if there is a comprehensive list of process loads so we can determine if we are missing something. For example, should exterior lighting and parking lighting be considered process loads? We currently have them as controlled loads. Our building is currently vacant, so we have used the 90.1 assumptions/defaults for plug loads, etc. because we don't have a specific list of equipment provided by a tenant. We are not using any Exceptional Calculation Methods. Do we need to "force" our model to reflect >25% process loads, or can we explain the minor discrepancy in the same manner I have used in this message? Thank you!

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 11/14/2013 - 16:54

No do not "force" the project to be at 25%! Exterior lighting and parking lighting are not process. I am not aware of a comprehensive list. It is basically everything that is not regulated by 90.1. So if it does not fall into HVAC, hot water, lighting, or motors then it it process. What is your building type? What loads are expected in the tenant spaces? How have you modeled plug loads? Is there an elevator load (often missed)? You model process as accurately as possible and if you are under 25% that is fine, just explain how you modeled process and why you are under 25%.

Thu, 11/14/2013 - 17:11

Thanks Marcus It's a plain vanilla, 2 story, 64000 SF vacant office building. Existing building, not ground-up. We did include the elevator as process. Here are the loads we are modeling: Interior Lighting Space Heating (Elec) Space Heating (Gas) Space Cooling Pumps Fans - Interior Receptacle Equipment (PROCESS) Elevator (PROCESS) Parking Lights Sevice Water Heating (Gas) Power Exhaust Fan

Thu, 11/14/2013 - 17:48

Looks right to me. Are you using a W/area value to model plug loads? If so in your explanation cite the source you used.

Thu, 11/14/2013 - 18:05

Yes, about 2.2 W/SF. This is the worst case, assuming a high density of equipment with little diversity.

Thu, 11/14/2013 - 18:37

Yep that is a very high number. Any particular reason to use such a high value in the absence of knowing the actual value? If you look in the 90.1 User's Manual Table G-B the value for a typical office is 0.75 W/sf. Such a high value might be justifiable depending on the likely nature of the tenants. Are we talking stock trading floors or very high data center usage or something else? If you used this value throughout the building in your model I have a very hard time believing that your are under 25%?

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.