See all forum discussions about NC-2009 SSc4.4

Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 SSc4.4 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 SSc4.4

See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 SSc4.4»

FAQs about SSc4.4 :

How does one account for off-site parking. Should the LEED boundary encompass this parking? Or alternatively may the project pursue the "no new parking" option?

If a project does not provide parking onsite but provides a shuttle service to new parking offsite, is that considered “no new parking” since the new parking is not onsite?

Does rebuilding an existing parking area with fewer spaces mean “no new parking”?

If a non-residential project wants to use Option 4, which references the ITE Parking Generation Study, where does one upload and submit required documentation? There is no Option 4 choice in the credit form.

How do you designate preferred parking if the parking facility is not under the owner's control?

How does one apply minimum zoning requirements to a project when it is part of a larger complex or campus?

Are there standards regarding how to document the spaces that will be dedicated as reserved?

How does a carpool/vanpool relate to a shared car service/company when it comes to the preferred parking requirements of this credit?

Should I consider motorbikes and parking spaces for them under this credit? What about fleet vehicles?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 SSc4.4:Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity

zoning establishes maximum parking

Craig Flandermeyer

LEEDuser Premium Member

9 thumbs up

August 12, 2013

Local zoning establishes a maximum parking count vs. a minimum; does the project need to pursue the ITE parking generation option?

Post a reply

Tristan Roberts

Representative

Vermont House of Representatives

LEEDuser Expert

7780 thumbs up

Sun, 11/03/2013 - 02:10

Craig, it sounds like it, yes—assuming the other options don't apply.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.