See all forum discussions about NC-2009 PIf3
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 PIf3 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 PIf3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 PIf3»

Forum discussion

NC-2009 PIf3:Occupant and Usage Data

Consistency in regularly occupied and unconditioned areas

My project team is aware that the total gross area must be consistent through PIf3 and EAp2 forms. We wonder whether or not it is also required to have consistency in "regularly occupied" and "unconditioned" areas across credits. GH

2
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Default Avatar
Erin Holdenried
Sustainability Architect
LEEDuser Basic Member
88 thumbs up

Fri, 05/03/2013 - 20:52

The regularly occupied space entered for IEQc8.1 & 8.2 should be similar. The form will prompt you for explanation if the areas deviate from PIf3 by more that 10%.

Sat, 05/04/2013 - 00:56

Regularly occupied PIf3 17,706 sf Regularly occupied EAp2 14,164 sf The difference is more than 20% but none of the forms prompts us to take further steps. The same happens with the unconditioned area. GH
Default Avatar
Erin Holdenried
Sustainability Architect
LEEDuser Basic Member
88 thumbs up

Mon, 05/06/2013 - 14:33

I was just referring to IEQc8.1 & 8.2. I am not as familiar with the EAp2 in regard the regularly occupied area discrepancies. But, is there a reason why they are different in your project?

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.