My project team is aware that the total gross area must be consistent through PIf3 and EAp2 forms.
We wonder whether or not it is also required to have consistency in "regularly occupied" and "unconditioned" areas across credits.
GH
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Erin Holdenried
Sustainability Architect125 thumbs up
May 3, 2013 - 4:52 pm
The regularly occupied space entered for IEQc8.1 & 8.2 should be similar. The form will prompt you for explanation if the areas deviate from PIf3 by more that 10%.
Alicia Villanueva
CEORevitaliza consultores
76 thumbs up
May 3, 2013 - 8:56 pm
Regularly occupied PIf3 17,706 sf
Regularly occupied EAp2 14,164 sf
The difference is more than 20% but none of the forms prompts us to take further steps.
The same happens with the unconditioned area.
GH
Erin Holdenried
Sustainability Architect125 thumbs up
May 6, 2013 - 10:33 am
I was just referring to IEQc8.1 & 8.2. I am not as familiar with the EAp2 in regard the regularly occupied area discrepancies. But, is there a reason why they are different in your project?