Forum discussion

NC-2009 MRc4:Recycled Content

International Project without Cut Sheets

We are working on an international project and the contractor is telling us that the standards in their country lack cut-sheets and MSDS sheets. As an alternative, we are proposing that a form letter would be created that could be sent to each manufacturer/supplier to document credits MRc3-6. This letter will include all applicable information and a signatory space to certify the validity of the information provided. Is this documentation acceptable in place on traditional cut-sheets?

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 04/24/2013 - 16:40

Josh, a letter FROM a manufacturer attesting to product specifications has been an acceptable way to verify product information for LEED. I am a little unsure how this works if you are sending a letter TO the manufacturer, though.

Wed, 04/24/2013 - 17:01

Josh- I've seen something similiar used before for manufacturers without cutsheets. Typically it's a blank form that the manufacturer fills out and send back to the project team. The big issue is making sure that it is incredibly clear to the review team that the information provided is directly from the manufacturer (and not from you/a contractor/etc.). My recommendation is to give the manufacturer your "form" in a word doc/template and ask that they put it on their own letterhead when they complete the relevant information (along with a representative's name and signature). That way, it's clear that the manufacturer provided the information and that it didn't come just from you. Another alternative would be to still use your form but ask them to also send a letter-head statement from that same individual attesting that they filled out your form. As an fyi since you say you'll use this for MRc3-6: I'd probably recommend including some additional information about how they are supposed to document each credit. For example, you might need make sure to clearly explain how they need to document MRc5. In cases where the manufacturer isn't familiar with/doesn't have pre-made documents, they might not understand that they need to come up with the extration location of all raw materials now for MRc5 and not just the location of manufacturer.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.