See all forum discussions about CI-2009 SSc3.3
 Subscribe to new posts about CI-2009 SSc3.3 Post a new question aboutCI-2009 SSc3.3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CI-2009 SSc3.3»
FAQs about SSc3.3 :

Why are the CI designated parking requirements in Cases 1 and & 2 Option 1 determined by a Full Time Equivalent of tenant space/building while for New Construction the requirements are simply a percentage of parking provided?

If a CI project occupies a building that has existing parking, but no designated parking to the tenant, can it pursue “no parking will be provided"?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CI-2009 SSc3.3:Alternative Transportation—Parking Availability

PUDs

Profile picture for user Peter Doo
Peter Doo
President
Doo Consulting LLC
LEEDuser Basic Member
136 thumbs up

Is parking that is negotiated as part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) considered the same as a zoning requirement?

2
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Thu, 09/06/2012 - 01:13

Peter, I think that would depend on the specific local regulations. Certainly, if rules governing the PUD are how the zoning regs are being enforced, that would make sense.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.