Forum discussion

CI-2009 MRc1.2:Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Interior Nonstructural Elements

Asbestos removal

My project is removing asbestos that is included in a wall system and replacing the gypsum board but retaining the structural system beneath it. For this credit, can I exclude the initial areas of the asbestos contained walls as part of my denominator value? I could have sworn I saw a CIR about this a while back but can't put my finger on it.

4

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 05/10/2011 - 18:54

I've seen the same information. Here's what LEED HC says: "Hazardous materials that are remediated as part of the project scope shall be excluded from the calculation of the percentage maintained." CIR/LI 5583 from 8/2002 also allows you to exclude from MRc2 calcs. Have you searched the Reference Guide addenda?

Tue, 05/10/2011 - 19:15

Thanks Susan. That's my sense too. I've looked through some of the addenda but may have missed it?

Tue, 05/10/2011 - 19:30

I did a quick search through the new LEED Interpretations and did not find it either. But the search should have popped up the LEED HC item and did not. Clearly I need more search practice.

Wed, 06/01/2011 - 22:11

Trying to bring this back into the forum discsusion again. Anyone know where I can reference as verification that my approach is acceptable?

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 17:04

Guidance from the GBCI confirming this approach: “Although it is not specifically stated in any reference guide, addenda, or LEED Interpretation (CIR) for MRc1.2 in ID+C or BD+C, GBCI confirms that projects should exclude the hazardous materials completely from the calculation for this CI credit – both numerator and denominator. This is assumed through the guidance found in MRc1.1 (pg. 347 in the BD+C reference guide) which states, "Hazardous materials that are remediated as a part of the project must be excluded from the calculation of the percentage maintained," even though it is technically a separate but related credit. Also, it is discussed through LI# 5885 from 9/19/2005, even though this is not directly applicable to 2009 projects or CI projects at this time.”

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 19:52

Hooray! Official closure. Thanks for posting this.

Fri, 04/06/2018 - 06:37

Did you use any expert?

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.