You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Ashley, thanks for joining the forum. However, we're generally not wild about people posting here promoting their own services without at least adding some value in terms of tips on earning the credit, lessons learned, probing questions, or sample documentation. We're also not big fans of general statements about how many credits a technology can get that aren't backed up with specifics. Many such claims are very overblown (no pun intended... you know cooling towers... :).Care to add some real value here in terms of any of the above?
Thanks Tristan, I appreciate your feedback. I am new to the LEEDuser and noticed someone else was interested in this technology from a previous discussion.
I wasn't looking to promote as much as try to get some feedback on this technology and others like it for sustainable solutions to water conservation.
Cool, it's good to have you here.Any hot tips on using this technology to earn WEc4?
I would be interested to hear whether this technology has been submitted for EBOM WEc4. It sounds like the same system we are submitting for an ID point under NC 2.2, referencing the CIR/Interpretation originally submitted for a different non-chemical treatment system.
The system we are using is a proprietary technology which one case-study article called 'zero liquid discharge'. It eliminates chemical corrosion, scale and biocide treatments, and eliminates regular blow-down. It's an intriguing system, and I'm looking forward to seeing how it performs on our project.
From what I've learned about the system so far, using it for WEc4.1 shouldn't be problematic, though it would require a 'special circumstances' narrative, since this system eliminates the need for some of the requirements of the credit.
However, I don't see how the technology, in and of itself, would have any bearing on WEc4.2 (per the other thread), since the elimination of water used for blow-down is still only a minor portion of the total water used by an evaporative cooling tower, whereas WEc4.2 requires at least 50% of makeup water to be from nonpotable sources.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.