After two rounds of review EAp2 was denied although we reckon that we had totally addressed all comments of the preliminary review and additionally the issues described as outstanding in the final

My sustainability consulting firm has been conducting the con docs (drawing) reviews for our clients for LEED compliance, but the method we have been using is not the most streamlined.

We were recently denied a credit in the Final Review Phase on the basis of information that was presented in the Preliminary Review Phase that GBCI had no comments upon.

It is absolutely insane the amount of time I (and I'm sure many others) waste working with LEEDOnline. The "quirks and bugs" are entirely too numerous to list.

Our project was denied credit due to a failed pre-requisite during the final review. The client once us to file an appeal to address the pre-requisite.

My project is a Campus project. All of the credits sought on the Mastersite scorecard are "Awarded" after Final Design Review (and appeal in some cases). What do I do now?

Hello, I already registered a project for split review but we haven't yet submitted the Preliminary Design Review.

im working in the relatively new leedonline for the first time in a while. on the credits 'tab' - some of the credits are shown with a yellow/cream colored highlight.

The LEED reviewers, once again, have succeeded in exasperating me and my team. We submitted under alternative compliance making a case that our approach supports the intent of the credit and why.

We are looking to certify nineteen concession spaces in an existing airport. The spaces all share one mechanical system and one water source and do not appear to be sub-metered.