After two rounds of review EAp2 was denied although we reckon that we had totally addressed all comments of the preliminary review and additionally the issues described as outstanding in the final design review do not seem substantiated.
In such occasions and in an effort to ensure the best understanding of the outstanding issues would it be possible to speak directly to the reviewers? And in terms of the fees, would the appeal fee for EAp2 include EAc1 as well, or should an additional fee for EAc1 be paid, although all work to be done is related to EAp2 only?