LEEDuser is hosting a forum devoted to the LEED v4 sixth public comment period, with key links, here.

Hey all, I have been doing a review of the 6th Public Comment Draft of v4 for BD+C and noticed something that seems a bit strange to me.

I've just begun my review of the newly revised MR Credits, and I keep seeing the following as a potential path for achieving some of these Credits: "USGBC approved program: Products that comply wit

I posted an article in its own LEEDuser forum going into more depth on what MRc4 Option 3 is all about.

The USGBC has been a code and rules enforcement organization for some time now.

While I haven't done an in-depth review of the Credits available for input in the 6th comment period, there are a few items that, if left as is, will be dealbreakers for me.

MR credits need to be radically simplified. Below is an example simplification: "Combine MRcr2, MRc3 and MRcr4 into one credit.

MR credits need to be radically simplified. Below is an example simplification: "Combine MRcr2, MRc3 and MRcr4 into one credit.

When I went in to make my comments the other day, I got kicked out before I could finish and since it is impossible to go back and edit on the USGBC website, I will complete my comments here. Plea

Under Option 1, It is not clear where the information that is being requested exists.