I have just added an FAQ to our guidance above, at GBCI's suggestion.

Review comment that I have never received before states the following: "Several products include recycled content but are listed as being 100% regional.

Our project scope is an historical building restoration and retrofit. Several items such as windows, doors and floor tiles are removed, restored in a workshop near the site project and returned to

I have not come across this situation before, but the Carpet for our entire building has already been purchased by the Owner.

What is the basis for the divisor chosen in the calculation for each of these particular modes of transportation?

I am getting conflicting information about the allowable extraction/harvesting point for recycled content in materials.

We purchase plywood and laminate from local vendors and manufacturer laid-up laminate panels from these two inputs. These laid up panels are then modified into casework.

The new Option 2 of MRc5 which was deemed to be applicable in the July 6, 2012 Addendum qualifies products and the raw materials used to make them based on the actual distance of the route they tra

An issue, new to me, has come up as I am reviewing a LEED Submittal for Structural Steel: Q.

The latest LEED Online version 04 for MRc4 Recycled Content and MRc5 Regional Materials now has a stand alone spreadsheet which is much easier to complete.