This ACP will soon be closed. Once closed it will not be available regardless of project registration date.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forForum discussion
Pilot-Credits WEpc94: No Cooling Tower
This ACP will soon be closed. Once closed it will not be available regardless of project registration date.
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
Lauren Leatherbarrow
ArchitectO Z Collaborative
September 22, 2021 - 1:35 pm
Thank you for that information- what does that mean if you have already registered for that pilot credit?
Please clarify.
Dave Hubka
Practice Leader - SustainabilityEUA
LEEDuser Expert
532 thumbs up
September 22, 2021 - 2:43 pm
it means you have already clicked the 'register for the pilot credit' tab and completed the registration info.
Adriana Hansen
ManagerCTE - Centro de Tecnologia de Edificações
118 thumbs up
October 15, 2021 - 1:40 pm
We would like to know if there is an estimated date of closure.
We have many projects that don´t have cooling tower but attends the requirements of the pilot and have the baseline system designated for the building using ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Appendix G Table G3.1.1 includes a cooling tower (systems 7 & 8).
For this type of projects the option to achieve these points is relevant and have to be considered in this strategy or in another one that can be pursued, resulting in water efficiency.
Bipin Karki
Sustainability Project Manager87 thumbs up
October 18, 2021 - 8:10 am
I think the registered v4 projects can attempt No Cooling Tower using v4.1 substutions, as per LEED v4.1 Building Design and Construction Getting started guide for beta particpants January 2019. The following requirements should be met:
Option 2. No Cooling Tower (2 points)
For projects without cooling towers or evaporative condensers, projects may earn full credit if all conditions are met:
the baseline system designated for the building using ASHRAE 90.1-2016 Appendix G Table G3.1.1 includes a cooling tower (systems 7 & 8)
the project design case does not include a cooling tower
the design case mechanical system does not use the latent heat of the evaporative cooling of water.
the project does not receive any cooling from a District cooling system
All other system types are ineligible for credit.
Dave Hubka
Practice Leader - SustainabilityEUA
LEEDuser Expert
532 thumbs up
October 19, 2021 - 1:19 pm
Great find Bipin!
So even though the v4 'No Cooling Tower' Alternative Compliance Path pilot credit is going away in v4...it shows up again as Option #2 of the v4.1 Optimize Process Water Use. Project teams would just need to sub this into the v4 WEc Cooling Tower Water Use slot.
Elcin Korukluoglu
co-FounderEMK Construction and Energy Co.
2 thumbs up
November 4, 2021 - 5:31 am
We registered WEpc94 No Cooling Tower pilot credit for our V4 project today. We also attempted v4.1 substution for WE Cooling Tower Water Use credit option 2: No Cooling Tower and uploaded ;
I will update the forum with any lessons after the review
Torsten Biernat
Baumann Consulting4 thumbs up
December 13, 2021 - 5:32 am
The v4.1 option "No cooling tower" is not available anymore (November 2020 Addenda). So any project registered after that date has to use the ACP to achieve this credit. And when this ACP is not available anymore, this will be a problem for projects with no cooling towers. Does anyone know why this was decided?
Daria Blanc-Mathieu
3 thumbs up
December 13, 2021 - 5:42 am
You can comply through 100% reduction, Option 2, LEEDv4.1 credit Optimize Process Water Use. You need only make sure that you baseline system is of listed type: to be eligible for Option 2, the baseline system designated for the building using ASHRAE 90.1-2016 Appendix G Table G3.1.1 must include a cooling tower (systems 7, 8, 11, 12, and 13).
Nicolas Jimenez
Commissioning AgentSUMAC Inc
February 2, 2022 - 9:59 am
Thank you for your clarification Daria, although we ended up pursuing the Pilot ACP, when we did the credit substitution we also interpreted Option 2 differently, understanding that similar requirements to the ACP were no longer available in v4.1.
After reading your comment, it dawned on me that demosntrating a 100% increase in water efficiency is easy since you're not using water for cooling purposes, therefore water use is non-existent.
Triple Green Building Group
Triple Green Building GroupApril 28, 2022 - 9:55 am
We have just registered this credit under our Campus project under te WE credit wit the same name.