FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

VRF efficiency requirements

Hello; Question; Are VRF sistems exempt from the efficiency requirements of 90.1-2007? Section 6.4.1.3 states that equipment not listed can be used. If they are exempt, why? Chillers are usually variable flow and are evaluated at full load. Shouldn't the same logic be applied to VRF systems?

2

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 01/30/2013 - 19:42

Not exempt for LEED. In 2007 this was not frequently installed in the US and there was not yet an agreed upon standard to determine efficiency. Use the minimum efficiency values found in 90.1-2010 for this equipment.

Wed, 01/30/2013 - 20:04

Thats interesting. We recieved a response to a seperate issue from GBCI stating that IF 90.1-2010 is used for any part of a project, then it must be applied to the entire project. If 90.1 - 2010 must be used to evaluate VRF efficiencies, then all projects with VRF systems must use 90.1-2010 in its entirety. I dont work with simulation, but I'd imagine that appendix G in 90.1-2010 would also have to be used instead of appendix G, 90.1-2007. Am I right?

Wed, 01/30/2013 - 20:36

Not sure of the context of that specific comment you got from GBCI but in general you can use addenda or certain aspects of 90.1-2010 without having to use the whole thing. This is especially true when 90.1-2007 does not address a specific issue at all. If you use parts of 90.1-2010 for EAp2 you do not have to use it for SSc8 for example. That is the only other credit I can think of off the top of my head that would be affected.

Wed, 01/30/2013 - 20:44

Rudolph, If you say you're using 90.1-2010, then you have to use it in it's entirety. The only time you cherry pick individual items from 2010 is when you're referencing specific addenda. Hope that clears it up a little bit.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.