FAQs about EAp2 :

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

VAV Fume Hood Velocity in Proposed vs. Baseline Case

We have a University Science Building that will house research and teaching labs with multiple VAV fume hoods in several spaces. Our design operational procedure for the VAV fume hoods is to maintain 80 feet per minute face velocity across the hood under normal operation and a reduced face velocity of 60 feet per minute when the space is unoccupied or nothing is present near the hood. A zone presence sensor is installed on every fume hood to determine when something or someone is in the vicinity of the hood and increase the airflow to the 80 fpm setpoint. A typical fume hood would be constant volume or have a constant face velocity whether it be 80 fpm, 100 fpm, or possibly greater. The airflow requirements for the fume hoods are driving the room ventilation requirements. Since ASHRAE 90.1‐2004 Appendix G paragraph G3.1.2.5 requires that minimum outdoor air ventilation rates be the same for the proposed and baseline buildings, are we able to model the energy savings from reducing the airflow thru the fume hoods during unoccupied periods and if so, what are we to base it against? Can this be modeled thru scheduling or can it be a process load?

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 12/04/2012 - 15:59

Hi Ralph, Sounds like it could be modeled thru scheduling and it certainly is a process load. The baseline must be determined by the project team and you will need to submit an exceptional calculation under Section 1.7 of the prerequisite form. The justification of a baseline is based on industry standard practice when building a new facility in your area. So if the sensors are typically not installed then the baseline is the same hoods without them.

Mon, 12/10/2012 - 23:26

Marcus, Thank you very much for your response. We have a follow up question. The question now is how one should model the process load for the fume hoods. If we were to say that the baseline fume hoods would operate at 80 fpm all of the time and the proposed fume hoods would operate at 80 fpm (occupied) and 60 fpm (unoccupied), in my opinion the only way to really model that is through scheduling. LEED rejected us last time because we didn’t have the minimum outside air values the same for both the baseline and proposed buildings so I can’t reduce my proposed ventilation or increase the baseline ventilation. If I were to adjust the scheduling of the ventilation for the proposed building does that mean we would need to submit an exceptional calculation? Your help is much appreciated! Thanks.

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 14:18

Yep one of the reasons for having to do an exceptional calculation is that you need to violate a modeling protocol to show the savings. In this case schedules must be identical so any change in schedules requires an exceptional calculation.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.