FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

VAV Fan control for baseline system 6

We have a rough time seeking to reduce supply fan energy during energy simulations. Could anybody throw some light on the following account: 1.) The project on hand is a plant that strictly regulates pressure differences among interior spaces. 2.) The proposed design reckons with a VSD on the air handler fan to adjust fan speed as airflow drops due to loaded filters, clogged cooling coils, etc. In contrast to generic VAV systems, the VSD on the air handler fan is not designed to vary supply airflow in proportion with room sensible heat. 3.) System 6 requires that the fan control be VAV. As far as I am concerned, the VAV of system 6 does not reflect the actual operation since modulating the supply airflow according to the room sensible heat may not concomitantly control the relative pressure differences among interior spaces. 4.) As a consequence, the fan energy of the proposed design is considerably higher than that of the baseline case. Is the table G3.1.1B in Appendix G an ironclad rule to follow? Is it relaxed in case the baseline is not comparable with the actual operation? Is there a minimum flow of VAV deemed effective to maintain relative pressure differences among internal spaces? In the event VAV is applicable to the factory in question, I suspect that both the proposed and baseline fans may not save significant energy, not to mention a barrage of pressure sensors and complex controls to make the system run as intended. Thank you very much in advance for all the responses.

2

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 12/17/2014 - 15:06

Yes you must follow Appendix G generally without exceptions. I would suggest you see if G3.1.1 Exception (c) applies to your situation. If it does then your VAV issue goes away. In general make sure you are not trying to get the baseline system to actually function the same way as the proposed. Quite often the baseline system configuration will not actually work in the real world.

Thu, 12/18/2014 - 08:32

Thank you very much indeed, Marcus. Your suggestion hit the bull's eye.The exception (C) under G3.1.1 is germane to our situation. The factory under consideration has three (3) levels of pressurization at 12 Pa (0.05”), 25 Pa (0.1”), and 38 Pa (0.15”). A multitude of spaces are pressurized to maintain 12.5 Pa (0.05”) and these spaces are contiguously located. Concerning the baseline case, am I allowed to lump these spaces together and cool them by a good-sized PSZ-HP (packaged rooftop heat pump) of system 4? In other words, this single zone consists of multiple spaces. Does each space need to be equipped with a PSZ-HP, making every zone a 1-space zone?

Thu, 12/18/2014 - 15:02

See G3.1.1. For a system 4 you need to map the systems to the proposed systems. Also see Table G3.1-7 about thermal blocks.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.