Hello,
This question has 2 parts.
1). Our project would like to submit LEEDV4 Fundamental and Enhanced Cx for Envelope only as ID points in a project registered for LEED 2009. The project is doing Fundamental Cx for the MEP systems. Can you confirm the project will be able to earn these points if Enhanced Cx is not pursued under 2009 for the MEP systems?
2) we intend to follow the full extent of envelope Cx from design - warranty following NIBS Guideline. One question is allowable sampling for functional testing of finest ration and panel assemblies. Will mockup testing then rigorous field observation satisfy the functional test requirements, or is there a minimum threshold for assembly sampling that must be met? I didn't see definitive guidance on testing methods which should be applied.
Many thanks!
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Scott Bowman
LEED FellowIntegrated Design + Energy Advisors, LLC
LEEDuser Expert
519 thumbs up
April 2, 2015 - 6:51 pm
Comment to Question 1: Yes, it has been pretty consistent that an ID point is awarded for envelope Cx, but you would only get 1 point, not 2 like you would under v4.
Scott Bowman
LEED FellowIntegrated Design + Energy Advisors, LLC
LEEDuser Expert
519 thumbs up
April 2, 2015 - 6:55 pm
Comment on Question 2: While I do not an envelope Cx, I play one on TV...no sorry, I have worked with many very qualified providers over the years. Frankly, I think you will see scope all over the map. My main comment would be that while MEP commissioning has tremendous value during the testing phase, in envelopes, it has to be designed and detailed right, then the submittals have to be right, and initial installation must be checked (or mocked up). If you wait for the final installation, and it fails, lawsuits probably follow, as fixes become expensive. So the more work done early, the better. Personally, I would think a mockup test, and then maybe a test early in installation followed by observation would be a good method, but like the TV doc, that is about all my advice is worth.
Candice Rogers
PresidentPaladin, Inc
21 thumbs up
May 12, 2015 - 10:12 am
Scott -
I realize I never properly thanked you for the response to my question.
So...Thank You!
Best -
Candice