Forum discussion

Time to contact the White House (I'm not kidding!)

I'm passing on an alarming (and truly Orwellian!) message from the AIA that some may have received:

The AIA is aware (and has been actively addressing) that there is a draft executive order circulating for consideration by White House officials that would officially designate “classical” architecture as the preferred style for the following building types: federal courthouses, all federal public buildings in the Capital region, and all other federal public buildings whose cost exceed $50 million in modern dollars. The AIA strongly and unequivocally opposes this change in policy to promote any style of architecture over another for these types of federal buildings across the country. 

The draft executive order defines “classical architectural style” to mean architectural features derived from classical Greek and Roman architecture. There are some allowances for “traditional architectural style” which is defined to mean classical architecture along with Gothic, Romanesque, and Spanish colonial. The draft executive order specifically prohibits the use of Brutalist architecture, or its derivatives.

Except for Brutalism, there is some language in the draft executive order that would allow for other architectural styles to be used in cases where it could be conclusively proven that a different style is necessary. However, the high bar required to satisfy the process described within the executive order would all but restrict the ability to design the federal buildings under this order in anything but the preferred style. The process would include a personal written justification from the Administrator, which cannot be delegated to staff, and which is still subject to review by the White House.

The AIA strongly condemns the move to enforce a top-down directive on architectural style. All architectural styles have value and all communities have the right to weigh in on the government buildings meant to serve them.

The AIA has been communicating with White House staff on this issue. We urge you to add your voice to reiterate our fervent belief that design decisions should be left to the designer and the community, not bureaucrats in Washington, DC. Click here to email President Trump.

Anyone else recall which historic leaders preferred a "classical" style? (think Albert Speers....) 

PLEASE ACT now and pass this on. If you prefer a call, here's the White House phone number:

Phone Number: 1-202-456-1414 (Switchboard) 1-202-456-1111 (Comments)

thanks 
Mary Ann

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 02/05/2020 - 20:12

Thanks for posting this Mary Ann. I was about to do so as well. It’s very easy to click and send a message. Please also post this to your office intranet sites. Thanks, Tiffany [http://gbbnftp.com/Logo_48pxWide.jpg] Tiffany Broyles Yost AIA, LEED AP BD+C, Fitwel Amb. Associate | Director of Sustainability and Resilience O: 502.583.0700 D: 513.419.8354 gbbn.com [http://gbbnftp.com/Facebook_12x12px.jpg] [http://gbbnftp.com/Instagram_12x12px.jpg] [http://gbbnftp.com/Twitter_12x12px.jpg] [http://gbbnftp.com/Linkedin_12x12px.jpg] [http://gbbnftp.com/TWP20pxWide.png] F

Wed, 02/05/2020 - 21:02

My local AIA ED points out that GSA has a great foundation for Federal building design excellence in the Guiding Principles here: https://www.gsa.gov/real-estate/design-construction/design-excellence/design-excellence-program/guiding-principles-for-federal-architecture She encourages all to contact their Congress people who might have influence on this (crazy!!!) idea. I'm going to give my Republican Senators a call (though I know they're busy right now acquiting you-know-who!) MAL Mary Ann Lazarus maryannlazarus2@gmail.com mobile: 314.805.9332

Fri, 02/07/2020 - 18:40

Sometimes I have to remind myself that this is all real life... but there are lots of reminders here in Nebraska that this is indeed the world we live in for now. Unfortunately I don't have a lot of faith that we will be able to contradict any current 'top down' directives from this administration. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try though, right? 

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.