FAQs about EAp2 :

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Tankless Electrical Water Heaters

Hi, Do tankless Electrical water heaters have to comply with any efficiency requirements, in order to comply with the 7.4 mandatory provisions? On table 7.8 the performance requirements for electrical water heaters seem to depend of the rated volume. Thanks

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 05/11/2016 - 18:34

No, they are not regulated.

Wed, 06/08/2022 - 18:54

For modeling purposes, on instances where I have electric tankless water heaters in the proposed, would the baseline's counterpart just be an identical water heater?  The first two rows in Table 7.8 are for electric water heaters, but they assume a storage of some volume, not tankless.

Wed, 06/08/2022 - 22:43

Table G3.1.1 (11) Baseline describes the baseline water heating system. It does appear that you model the same system type in the baseline as the proposed.

Thu, 06/09/2022 - 12:39

Section 7.4.2 makes the statement, "Equipment not listed in Table 7.8 has no minimum performance requirements".  Electric tankless is not listed. G3.1.1 (11)b references new hot water systems, which is my case, but it refers back to 7.4.2 which simply says no minimum performance requirements exist.  Since both of the above seem to point back to each other with regard to electric tankless, it's more of an unwritten rule for for systems not specified in Table 7.8 that it simply must be identical to the Proposed. Would you agree? That is not explicitly said (which would be nice), but seems to be the logical conclusion. I wish I could have a singular reference to back that up.

Thu, 06/09/2022 - 13:06

Also, is the SL value supposed to be the same for Proposed and Baseline? I appreciate your feedback and clarifications, Marcus!

Thu, 06/09/2022 - 13:12

In this case yes it would be modeled identically. 7.4.2 is a mandatory provision so this is simply saying that there is no minimum efficiency required for tankless water heaters. G3.1.1(11) Baseline says that the baseline water heating system should be the same fuel source as the proposed. The reason that tankless systems should be modeled idetically is bacause they do not have a minimum efficiency requirement. IF you want to try and show any energy savings you could try to use the exceptional calculation method.

Thu, 06/09/2022 - 13:20

Yes I think the SL should be the same. Again if you want to claim any savings relative to a tank-type water heater use the exceptional calculation method.

Thu, 06/09/2022 - 13:29

Great! Thank you very much for the guidances.

Thu, 06/09/2022 - 14:00

I also have a gas tank heater in the project with 96% Et. In this case, there would be savings associated with the increased efficiency over Baseline 80% Et correct?

Thu, 06/09/2022 - 14:14

Yes there is!

Thu, 06/09/2022 - 18:53

The SL has an Et term in the equation. My proposed has the 96% Et, but the baseline would be based upon 80% Et. So the SL would be a bit different in that case, resulting in savings from both the overall Et and the computed SL as well, correct? Also, the SL is based upon a 70F temperature difference between stored water and ambient; the relation will be used nontheless, even when this temperature difference is not 70F?

Fri, 06/10/2022 - 14:27

In 90.1-2010 Table 7.8, for gas storage water heaters, the relation for SL is .8*Et*(Q/800 + 110*V^.5). If my proposed Et is 96% and baseline is 80%, then there is savings from Et alone, and from SL since there is Et in the relation. Do I interpret that correctly?

Fri, 06/10/2022 - 14:53

My mistake. I looked at a User's Manual and found that the max SL does not include the .8*Et. The formatting in the chart makes it look like it's all one relation.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.